Click here to view the complete Professional Engineer Report.
Excerpts from 2006 professional engineer's report: (for a copy of the full report, contact B&G Electronics-479-524-8921)
Interim Performance Testing Report
This Professional Engineer's report covers the above testing program, as designed, carried out and documented by Ken M. Gibbs, (Professional Bachelor of Mechanical Engineering), in Santa Clarita, California, U.S.A., during September and October 2006.
The product tested is referred to as “the Ionizer” in this report.
A summary of the conclusion for this interim report is as follows;
Each of the vehicles tested as a part of this program improved in various ways, to varying degrees, after the installation of the Ionizer. From this observation, it can be concluded that the Ionizer is capable of effecting performance improvements in spark ignited, internal combustion engines, in the desirable areas tested, these being fuel economy, power output, exhaust emissions, smoothness and drivability.
A payback analysis reveals that the Ionizer is a viable addition to any vehicle or fleet (see section 4.3 – Ionizer Viability).
Further test and development work is required to fully quantify these benefits across the world vehicle fleet, including past and present vehicle designs.
While testing for Ionizer performance, the practicalities of Ionizer installation and operation were encountered. These important factors are also discussed herein.
Report Contents Page Section Title Page Number
(for a copy of the full report, contact B&G Electronics-479-524-8921)
0) Introduction 3
1) About this Report, its Purpose, History and Author 3
2) Test Program Summary 5
3) Vehicle Test Programs with Results 7
3.1 Ford Mustang Sport Coupe, V-6. 7
3.2 JEEP Grand Cherokee Laredo, Straight 6. 8
3.3 Toyota Camry LE, Straight 4. 12
3.4 Champion 440 RV, V-8, 12,000 lb GVW 14
3.5 Volvo 240 DL, Straight 4. 15
4) Conclusions 19
5) Suggestions Supporting Future Ionizer Expansion 23
6) Disclaimer 24
7) Responsible Testing Engineer Sign-Off 25
APPENDICES
One References Used in the Report 26
Two Typical Ionizer Reports from the Past 27
Three Glossary of Terms as Used in this Test Program 30
Four Test Program Photo Gallery - (9 photos displayed) 34
0) Introduction
This interim report concerns the performance testing for the Electronic Engine Ionizer (“Ionizer”). This product is an after-market improvement device for spark ignition internal combustion engines. In this interim report the test program, its major results and conclusions are broadly outlined.
The Ionizer is manufactured in the U.S.A., by Arkansas Blue Skies Inc., of Siloam Springs, Arkansas, U.S.A. (“the manufacturer”). The website for the product is located at the Internet web address: http://www.engineionizer.com
A good description and background concerning the Ionizer can be found there. In summary, it is claimed that the Ionizer utilizes ignition system energies, in a simple way, to enhance the preparation of the fuel mixture within the combustion chamber of the engine, prior to combustion. It is further claimed that this action increases the efficiency and effectiveness of combustion.
B. & G. Electronics LLC, also of Siloam Springs, Arkansas, U.S.A. are the Internet distributors for the Ionizer product. This group also maintains the Ionizer website.
4) CONCLUSIONS
4.1 - Performance Improvements due to Ionizer installation
Each of the vehicles tested as a part of this test program improved in various ways, to varying degrees, after the installation of the Ionizer. From this observation, it can be concluded that the Ionizer is capable of effecting performance improvements in spark ignited, internal combustion engines, in the desirable areas of fuel economy, power output, exhaust emissions, smoothness and drivability. The best figures obtained were, in certain cases:
A) A 16% fuel economy improvement (+ or – 10%),
B) Available peak power outputs temporarily increasing by up to 15% (+ or- 5%),
C) Emissions that could be reduced by as much as 25%, again in certain cases, on vehicles that are blueprinted.
According to the manufacturer's website, such benefits are also demonstrated on vehicles operating on any liquid or gaseous fuel.
4.2 – Throttle Response Improvements
The Ionizer was found to improve throttle response and low to medium load operation in all engines tested. Consequently, operating smoothness, drivability and responsiveness are always reported as being improved, following Ionizer installation, particularly where the vehicle was blueprinted before installation.
4.3 - Ionizer Viability Calculation
In all product engineering work, the viability of the product is important. The following calculation for viability was carried out, assuming a situation as follows:
1) 25,000 miles per year, $2.30 per gallon, 18 mpg, 10 to 16% savings in fuel.
Fuel costs per year, in stock form = (25,000/18) x 2.3 = $3,194 for fuel annually.
At a 10% saving = 0.1 x 3194 = approximately $319 are saved per year.
At a 16% saving = 0.16 x 3194 = approximately $511 are saved per year.
If $90 are spent to purchase and fit the Ionizer to a 6 cylinder vehicle then payback =
@ 10% saving = (90/319) x 12 = 3.4 months.
@ 16% saving = (90/511) x 12 = 2.1 months.
This represents an impressive investment, in either case.
7) RESPONSIBLE TESTING ENGINEER SIGN-OFF
(for this report, Version 1.5.1) Release Date = 31 October, 2006. By signing, the following statements are factual.
This interim professional engineer's report outlines the test work carried out on an automotive after market product called the Electronic Engine Ionizer, or Ionizer.
It is a factual summary of the test work and the outcome of that work. The professionalism of this report is intended to assist other groups to carry out similar work, thereby continuing to improve and expand this particular industry. At all times it is assumed that the reader shall follow all relevant laws and ensure that they are also followed by those in his/her sphere of influence. The author takes no responsibility arising from the use or misuse of information contained herein.
For further information, any enquiries or to send feedback, do email me at the address given below.
Ken M. Gibbs (Professional Bachelor of Mechanical Engineering)
Design and Transport Engineer
email; ev_research_2004@yahoo.co.uk
Report Version: 1.5.1 Date: 31 October, 2006. Page 25 of 37.
Copyright © 2006 Ken M. Gibbs, trading as E.V. Research. All Rights Reserved.
Click here to view the complete Professional Engineer Report.
Interim Performance Testing Report
This Professional Engineer's report covers the above testing program, as designed, carried out and documented by Ken M. Gibbs, (Professional Bachelor of Mechanical Engineering), in Santa Clarita, California, U.S.A., during September and October 2006.
The product tested is referred to as “the Ionizer” in this report.
A summary of the conclusion for this interim report is as follows;
Each of the vehicles tested as a part of this program improved in various ways, to varying degrees, after the installation of the Ionizer. From this observation, it can be concluded that the Ionizer is capable of effecting performance improvements in spark ignited, internal combustion engines, in the desirable areas tested, these being fuel economy, power output, exhaust emissions, smoothness and drivability.
A payback analysis reveals that the Ionizer is a viable addition to any vehicle or fleet (see section 4.3 – Ionizer Viability).
Further test and development work is required to fully quantify these benefits across the world vehicle fleet, including past and present vehicle designs.
While testing for Ionizer performance, the practicalities of Ionizer installation and operation were encountered. These important factors are also discussed herein.
Report Contents Page Section Title Page Number
(for a copy of the full report, contact B&G Electronics-479-524-8921)
0) Introduction 3
1) About this Report, its Purpose, History and Author 3
2) Test Program Summary 5
3) Vehicle Test Programs with Results 7
3.1 Ford Mustang Sport Coupe, V-6. 7
3.2 JEEP Grand Cherokee Laredo, Straight 6. 8
3.3 Toyota Camry LE, Straight 4. 12
3.4 Champion 440 RV, V-8, 12,000 lb GVW 14
3.5 Volvo 240 DL, Straight 4. 15
4) Conclusions 19
5) Suggestions Supporting Future Ionizer Expansion 23
6) Disclaimer 24
7) Responsible Testing Engineer Sign-Off 25
APPENDICES
One References Used in the Report 26
Two Typical Ionizer Reports from the Past 27
Three Glossary of Terms as Used in this Test Program 30
Four Test Program Photo Gallery - (9 photos displayed) 34
0) Introduction
This interim report concerns the performance testing for the Electronic Engine Ionizer (“Ionizer”). This product is an after-market improvement device for spark ignition internal combustion engines. In this interim report the test program, its major results and conclusions are broadly outlined.
The Ionizer is manufactured in the U.S.A., by Arkansas Blue Skies Inc., of Siloam Springs, Arkansas, U.S.A. (“the manufacturer”). The website for the product is located at the Internet web address: http://www.engineionizer.com
A good description and background concerning the Ionizer can be found there. In summary, it is claimed that the Ionizer utilizes ignition system energies, in a simple way, to enhance the preparation of the fuel mixture within the combustion chamber of the engine, prior to combustion. It is further claimed that this action increases the efficiency and effectiveness of combustion.
B. & G. Electronics LLC, also of Siloam Springs, Arkansas, U.S.A. are the Internet distributors for the Ionizer product. This group also maintains the Ionizer website.
4) CONCLUSIONS
4.1 - Performance Improvements due to Ionizer installation
Each of the vehicles tested as a part of this test program improved in various ways, to varying degrees, after the installation of the Ionizer. From this observation, it can be concluded that the Ionizer is capable of effecting performance improvements in spark ignited, internal combustion engines, in the desirable areas of fuel economy, power output, exhaust emissions, smoothness and drivability. The best figures obtained were, in certain cases:
A) A 16% fuel economy improvement (+ or – 10%),
B) Available peak power outputs temporarily increasing by up to 15% (+ or- 5%),
C) Emissions that could be reduced by as much as 25%, again in certain cases, on vehicles that are blueprinted.
According to the manufacturer's website, such benefits are also demonstrated on vehicles operating on any liquid or gaseous fuel.
4.2 – Throttle Response Improvements
The Ionizer was found to improve throttle response and low to medium load operation in all engines tested. Consequently, operating smoothness, drivability and responsiveness are always reported as being improved, following Ionizer installation, particularly where the vehicle was blueprinted before installation.
4.3 - Ionizer Viability Calculation
In all product engineering work, the viability of the product is important. The following calculation for viability was carried out, assuming a situation as follows:
1) 25,000 miles per year, $2.30 per gallon, 18 mpg, 10 to 16% savings in fuel.
Fuel costs per year, in stock form = (25,000/18) x 2.3 = $3,194 for fuel annually.
At a 10% saving = 0.1 x 3194 = approximately $319 are saved per year.
At a 16% saving = 0.16 x 3194 = approximately $511 are saved per year.
If $90 are spent to purchase and fit the Ionizer to a 6 cylinder vehicle then payback =
@ 10% saving = (90/319) x 12 = 3.4 months.
@ 16% saving = (90/511) x 12 = 2.1 months.
This represents an impressive investment, in either case.
7) RESPONSIBLE TESTING ENGINEER SIGN-OFF
(for this report, Version 1.5.1) Release Date = 31 October, 2006. By signing, the following statements are factual.
This interim professional engineer's report outlines the test work carried out on an automotive after market product called the Electronic Engine Ionizer, or Ionizer.
It is a factual summary of the test work and the outcome of that work. The professionalism of this report is intended to assist other groups to carry out similar work, thereby continuing to improve and expand this particular industry. At all times it is assumed that the reader shall follow all relevant laws and ensure that they are also followed by those in his/her sphere of influence. The author takes no responsibility arising from the use or misuse of information contained herein.
For further information, any enquiries or to send feedback, do email me at the address given below.
Ken M. Gibbs (Professional Bachelor of Mechanical Engineering)
Design and Transport Engineer
email; ev_research_2004@yahoo.co.uk
Report Version: 1.5.1 Date: 31 October, 2006. Page 25 of 37.
Copyright © 2006 Ken M. Gibbs, trading as E.V. Research. All Rights Reserved.
Pictures are a representation of the product and may not be the actual application photo for your vehicle, but will function as intended.
B&G Electronics, LLC is not responsible for typographical errors. Price subject to change without notice.
Copyright 2004 B&G Electronics, LLC, all rights reserved.
Copyright 2004 B&G Electronics, LLC, all rights reserved.
- How Does It Work?
- FAQS
- Installation
- Testimonials
- Warranty
- Technical Paper
- Certified Test Results
- Published Articles
- Shipping Info
- 2 Cylinder Engine Ionizer
- 3 Cylinder Engine Ionizer
- Boat 6 Engine Ionizer
- 10 Cylinder Fuel Saver
- 6 Cylinder Fuel Saver
- 4 Cylinder Fuel Saver
- 8 Cylinder Fuel Saver
- Professional Engineering Report
- Great Links
- Wire Loom
