TESTIMONIALS FOR THE ENGINE IONIZER

Testimonials
June 25, 2003
On the evening of April 26, 2003 at North Texas Drag Way in Denton Texas, my wife and I were making a few passes with my car (an 80 Pontiac Trans Am) called the Fire Injun. The car is an old Pro Stock drag car from the early 80’s. I run a 462 ci. Pontiac with a 2-speed glide. The car had a best of 5.92in the 1/8th . On this night, we had made 2 passes (6.01 and 5.98). We run in the super Gas category in the NHRA and the car is very consistent and any changes in time and speed would be made with the change of the fuel pill or timing.
A man came to me and introduced himself as Lynn Buhr. He had a product (Ionizer) that would decrease my E.T. My first thought was-how much? He told me to try it and tell him what it would do. Why not. I could not see how it could hurt the car. I snapped it on and made 3 more passes (5.92, 5.86, and 5.82) with no changes to anything on the car. I have been drag racing for over 26 years and I’ve spent hundreds, enven thousands, for a tenth of a second. I had just snapped this little deal on and decreased the E.T. by over a Tenth for under $60.00.
Since then, I have taken the Ionizer off the car and lost the tenth of a second. It is back on the car now and I’ve taken a runner up spot at a S/G event. It is also now on my Chevy Dually pull truck and I’m seeing an increase in the mileage when towing my 28 ft. enclosed trailer. The truck was getting 5.2 mpg. We now have gotten as much as 6.7 mpg with the Ionizer. Just recently, I also put it on the other 2 Trans Ams in our family.
All in all, this product works!!!
Brad Thompson – Gainesville, Texas bradleyt@cooke.net
***************************************
Jerry Hagemeir, Joplin, Missouri
October, 2007
I put the Engine Ionizer on a 1995 4 cyliner Ford Escot and increased the gas mileage from 28 mpg to 36 mpg. Sent me a 6 cylinder!
****************************
Sat Jul 28, 2007
Anthony Metcalf
Adelaide, South Australia
At last a product that does what it says. So many products out there today never deliver on their promise but the fuel ionizer certainly does.
********************************
From: "Anthony Metcalf"
To: EngineIonizer@Yahoo.com
Subject: Fuel Ionizer
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007
Hello there,
I have just installed your fuel ionizer and am impressed!I have a 1988 Ford Falcon Utility(pick up truck) and I noticed an immediate smoother running engine .It does not sound -how can I put it? - laboured, as it used to.When I drove to the city I tried pushing the gas pedal to the floor and noticed the response was quicker.Being a cynic, a realist and a sceptic about manufactureres claims about their products I must admit yours truly does what it says! Good on you guys!
I am now going to check the fuel consumption over the next 7-10 days.Currently my ute -sorry - pickup is getting 5.8km to a litre of gas. In American terms that would equate to 16 miles to the gallon. OK remember this is city driving where it is stop start all the time as you well know.
I will let you know the figures using the fuel ionizer as I mentioned earlier.
******************************
Tue, 15 May 2007
From: fasensio@adelphia.net
To: EngineIonizer@yahoo.com
RE: results
Hello, I am glad to say that my courier mpgs have gone up from 24-26 to 28-31 mpg. And I did an all freeway test the other night and got 35 mpgs...up from 29-30. I have tried so many gas savers, some of which are pretty expensive and depend on the car’s computer to work. Many times they just do not work at all. So I was very happy that the ionizers are for real and so inexpensive. I will be ordering my first wholesale batch within a few weeks. Thank you, Fabian Asensio
Sherman Oaks CA
*****************************
Sat, 7 Apr 2007 03:41:47 -0700 (PDT)
Customer feedback on order engineionizer-store-2055
Rating: Excellent
Price Rating: Good
Shipping Options Rating: Excellent
Delivery Rating: Excellent
Ease of Purchase Rating: Excellent
Customer Service Rating: Excellent
Body: Easy to install. Increase in engine performance was noticed immediately after installation.
Patrick Winslow
************************
Wed, 21 Mar 2007 01:54:33 -0700 (PDT)
Customer feedback on order engineionizer-store-2035
Rating: Excellent
Price Rating: Good
Shipping Options Rating:OK
Delivery Rating: Excellent
Ease of Purchase Rating: Excellent
Customer Service Rating: Excellent
Body: Good seller, no bullshit, there is being done what is promised at the webshop. The delivery was also monitored, very good!!! And...the product, the Electronic Engine Ionizer works fine!
****************************
Sat, 10 Mar 2007
Customer feedback on order engineionizer-store-2020
Rating: Excellent
Price Rating: Excellent
Shipping Options Rating: Excellent
Delivery Rating: Excellent
Ease of Purchase Rating: Excellent
Customer Service Rating: Excellent
Body: Very pleased with the product and the speedy delivery.
******************************
Monday, September 18, 2006
Hi Pat; I received the Ionizer Friday and installed it that night. I could tell a difference in the performance right away!
More power, and runs smoother.
Donald L. Neal
***************************
Scott Moody
August 15, 2006
Several months ago I bought an Engine Ionizer for my 04 Dodge Ram 1500. It took a while for me to get around to installing the device on my engine. My gas mileage didn't improve much over the 10-12 mpg I was getting before installation. I just figured that was the best it would do and forgot about it.
Two weeks ago I had to take a trip in the truck which required me to pull a large U-Haul trailer fully loaded. To my surprise I got 16 mpg on that trip. I checked the mileage today and it is still getting 16! I just might be able to live with that.
**********
Richard Wilkins
Wynne, Arkansas
August 3, 2006
My father-in-law drives a 1997 Chevrolet 3500 extended cab dually with a 454 V8 and automatic transmission. On trips between Wynne and Watts, OK, he was averaging 14 mpg with the air on. On the 2 trips since we put the Ionizer on, he has averaged 22 mpg with the air on. That is a savings of over $55.00 on each 630 mile round trip at the current average gas price of $3.30/gallon.
**********
31) Marjorie Polakowski
Rogers Arkansas
August 8, 2006
My old Chevy Van went from 15mpg to 19 mpg. Thanks! (comment on order for another Ionizer)
**********
30) Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005
From: "Thomas Rekus"
To: "Electronic Engine Ionizer"
I have a grand Caravan and up till now I was able to get about 425 KM per tank of gas but after installing your product I now get 500 KM or more on a tank. This is really good and trust me I do not drive slow. At an average speed of 130 KM per hour, this is excellent I must say. At that speed, it's 15% more then what I was doing before, so if I were to drive slower that means more savings.
But, never the less, I would like to distribute your product, and I would like to make the proper arrangements.
Thank you in advance
Thomas Rekus
**********
28) Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005
From: "Tim WEATHERS"
To: engineionizer@yahoo.com
I am happy to report that I calculated close to a 33% initial savings in fuel after refueling early this evening!! I also went by the business mailbox and found your cd's, thank you!
Sincere Regards,
Timothy Weathers
**********
27) February 2, 2004
My name is Tom Mason. For the last several years, I have been a sales man for Bixby Auto Sales in Bixby, Oklahoma. I was a mechanic in the army. When I heard about the ELECTRONIC ENGINE IONIZER, I was intrigued and impressed. I have been using the IONIZER now for more than a year and a half. I have now tried the IONIZER on more than 160 vehicles. Here are some of the documented results.
1. 1995 Grand AM- 105,000 miles, 6 cylinder GT. Since the installation of the IONIZER, it has a lot more power, quicker response, and better starting. In town, the gas mileage went from 18 to 23 mpg.
2. 1981 350 Corvette-129, 000 miles. This car has a history of loading up with fuel between uses. Before the IONIZER, it would take 5-10 minutes to warm up and idle reasonably. With the IONIZER, it starts much faster, takes less than 30 seconds to warm up, idles very smoothly, and has a lot more acceleration.
3. 1993 Mustang-4 cylinder - 143,000 miles. Original specifications show 21-mpg city, 29-mpg highway. Prior to IONIZER installation, it was averaging 21-mpg highway. Within 2 tanks of gas after the IONIZER was installed correctly, it is now again getting 29 mpg. Originally, I installed the IONIZER with one capacitor backward and 2 capacitors on 1 wire and no capacitors on a second wire. There was no change in the performance of the vehicle until I corrected the installation.
4. My 1977 17 foot motor home- 400 hp GMC - 89,000 miles. This vehicle had not run for the last 3 years. The previous owners verified gas mileage as 8 mpg. The battery was charged up and an IONIZER installed. The engine started. On the 200-mile trip back to Tulsa from Branson, MO, the first tank got 10 mpg and the second tank of gas got 11 mpg.
5. 1990 Jeep Wagoneer – 4 cylinders – 96,000 miles. Was running rough, very little power, could not pull up local hills in 4th gear. Top speed was about 55 mph. Compression check showed 60-65 lbs and should have been 110 lbs. With the IONIZER installed, the engine smoothed out. It could pull up the same hills in 4th gear and could run at 65-70 mph. It is now being overhauled and I look forward to running the overhauled engine with the IONIZER installed.
One month, we put IONIZER on all 30 vehicles on our pre-owned car lot. That month we sold 50% more cars. I am really impressed with the IONIZER results. To date, every IONIZER I have put on has shown an improvement. I recommend the IONIZER for any vehicle. I definitely see the advantage of installing them on all the cars on a used car lot such. The advantage that the customer sees is faster starts, smoother idle, less tailpipe smoke, more low-end torque or power pulling out of our parking lot onto the highway.
Tom Mason – 918-605-4746
Bixby Auto Sales
15000 S. Memorial
Bixby, Oklahoma
**********
26) December 5, 2002
I drive a 1991 Nissan 4WD, 5-speed, 4-cylinder SUV. In the past, I regularly got 190 miles per tank of gas. Now with the Electronic Engine Ionizer, I get 230 miles per tank of gas. I am really happy!
Chad Gilman
Bentonville, Arkansas
**********
25) I am a mechanic and skeptical about new gadgets, especially when putting them on my vintage truck. I personally overhauled it 40,000 miles ago. It is a 1976 Chevy ¾ ton, 4-door, 4WD with a 350 engine. After seeing other people’s vehicles do so much better with the Ionizer, I finally put one on my truck 2 months ago. I drive a long way to work and I was spending $60.00 per week for gas. After the first two weeks with the ionizer on, I now spend $50.00 or less each week. I notice my truck starts better and has more power leaving the curb and stop signs. This Electronic Engine Ionizer is amazing!
Kent Gilman
Bill’s Auto Repair
SW A Street
Bentonville, Arkansas
479-273-0785
**********
24) I have been an auto mechanic for years and years. I now own and operate 2 auto repair centers in Bentonville, Arkansas. I have seen a number of these Ionizers put on all kinds of vehicles and nearly every customer has been very pleased. I put one on my own 1999 Chevy Tahoe that was averaging 15 mpg. After the third tank of gas, it now gets 18 mpg consistently.
I recommend the Ionizer to many of my customers with confidence.
Bill Hall
Bill’s Automotive One
508 Moberly
Bentonville, Arkansas
**********
23) January 13, 2003
Before Installing the Engine Ionizer on my 88 Lincoln Towncar, I checked my mileage over ten tanks of gas. I averaged 17.1 M.P.G. I installed the ionizer kit which took about a minute. I soon noticed the engine response was quicker and seemed to have more power. I checked mileage on my next ten tanks and they averaged 19.7 M.P.G. The engine also seems to run smoother and idles a little faster. Since I travel extensively with my newspaper business the savings on gas consumption is considerable.
Thanks for turning me on to this ingenious little product,
Buzz Barton
Fastlane Motorsport News
flmsports@aol.com
**********
22) Rating: Excellent
Price Rating:Excellent
Shipping Options Rating:Excellent
Delivery Rating:Excellent
Ease of Purchase Rating:Excellent
Customer Service Rating:Excellent
Body:I own a 1993 Jeep with built in computor. I have gone from 17.5 MPG in town driving to 21.2 MPG after only two tanks.
Daniel Wilkinson-Dallas, Texas
**********
21) September 4, 2002
Don Lattie
Don’s Automotive Repair, Inc.
115 W. 151st Street South, Suite B
Bixby, OK 74008
My son, who is a mechanic in my shop, put one of your Electronic Engine Ionizers on his 1990 Evolution Harley (1250 c.c.). He could feel the difference in power right away. So next, we put the ionizer on a 77 Corvette we own. It made a lot of difference in the way it runs.
We also put one on a customer’s 2001 Chevy pickup with one of those new Vortex V-8 engines. The customer drove away and then came back after driving 3 blocks. He was so impressed with the change in performance that he had to come back and tell us. I feel confident that this thing really works.
**********
20) From: "Donnie Green"
Date: Thursday, September 05, 2002 8:32 PM
I installed the Ionizer on my 1999 Chevy 4 Wheel Drive Extended Cab at your shop on August 4th and drove to Fort Smith, AR. It was approximately 88 miles. To the best of my knowledge, I got 18 1/2 miles per gallon. I bought the pickup brand new and I have never got over 16 miles per gallon. I installed one on my wife’s Ford Explorer today. I'm anxious to see how much it helps her performance. I need two more of the wide sixes to put on other vehicles.
Donnie Green
**********
19) April 14, 2004
Rating: Excellent
Price Rating: Excellent
Shipping Options Rating: Excellent
Delivery Rating: Excellent
Ease of Purchase Rating: Excellent
Customer Service Rating: Excellent
The product is excellent. The first day I was about to take it off and send it back but the next day I started seeing the improvement and, Boy, was I surprised. My mileage doubled! Now with a tune up, I should do better.
Sincerely, Frank Martinez
Moses Lake, Washington
**********
18) April 12, 2004
When I bought my daughters' 1989 Chevy Silverado with the 350 Cu. In. engine, she told me the best they ever got was 12 miles per gallon. They mostly got 10 and one half to 11 and one half miles per gallon. I knew I could do better with it than that, and I did. I get 13.4 to almost 15 now and I have driven it from the Gulf Coast to Ohio and back. When I first bought it from her, I gave it the "regular tune up". You know. Cap, rotor, plugs and plug wires and oil change. I drove it to my house from hers and got 11 to 12 and one half mpg on that 550-mile drive. Some improvement but not enough.
I had the over 1000 mile one-way trip coming up at Christmas vacation time and I looked around on the Internet and found the Electronic Engine Ionizer Fuel Saver at http://store.yahoo.com/engineionizer-store/ and read the credentials and some of the science about it. I decided this is one that must work very well after reading testimonies and also talking to the store secretary. She had an engine just like mine and also got a money saving boost in mileage. I bought one and put it on.
I drove the trip north and spent about $80 for the first half of the trip and I know I would have spent $93 with out the Electronic Engine Ionizer Fuel Saver. So now I know that I saved $26 on the round trip, and that also means I will continue to save that amount every 2000 miles I drive with this Chevy Silverado. Now "if" you know you are going to "pay" for the gas to drive a 100 thousand miles on your vehicle and you can save $26 every 2000 miles that is 50 times $26 or over $1300 that I don't have to shell out on gasoline for a very "small" investment (guaranteed refundable) and "10 or 15 minutes" of my time.
If you don't have one of these I guess you will have to spend the $1300. (Duh?) And when you figure that you have to earn more than that on your job to get paid the $1300 net after they take out the taxes, etc. Don't take too much thinking to see this is a GREAT INVESTMENT! (And it does work!) I just bought two more units for my two old Lincoln Towncars (1990 and a 1991). I haven' t driven them around a lot yet but I have felt the performance improve in both cars and I just smile about how I found one of those gas savers that not only "works" but works VERY WELL! I wrote this out to save you all money and help slow down the imported oil coming into our country!
Sincerely,
Gary W. Snyder
Gautier, Mississippi
********
17) Tue, 9 Aug 2005
I have purchase three of these Ionizers. My last trip of a thousand miles (one way) to Ohio from the Gulf Coast averaged in my Chevy Suburban 350 engine was just a little lower than my winter trip where I was getting almost 16 mpg. I went this time with the air conditioner on "all the way" and averaged 13.8 mpg because it was a record hot summer. If I had not put an Engine Ionizer on the plug wires (so easy) .... I would have gotten 10.5 mpg that my daughter always got when she owned it... "What a savings" at the over $2 a gallon price for the Gasoline companies. I am saving about $28 or $29 per 1000 miles and that one round trip paid for more then what I paid for the Engine Ionizer. I would tell folks or anybody you want me to tell. I would rather give my hard earned dollars to an honest hard working and very intelligent American (protecting all those who will listen and buy one of these) than the gas companies (who are just inflating the prices and that is gangsterism in my opinion)
This is one of those gas saving "gadgets" that REALLY works!
Sincerely,
Gary W. Snyder
**********
16)September 19, 2002
I have a 1982 Chevy 1-ton 4x4 dually work truck with a V8-350 engine. It is my tree service work truck and I usually pull a 6,400 lb chipper with it. Before installing the Electronic Engine Ionizer in July this year, I was getting 7 to 7 ½ MPG and it pulled good. Now, with the Ionizer, it gets 10 MPG regularly and has a lot more power. I also put an Ionizer on the wood chipper motor. Within a few hours of use, it started running better and better. I believe it runs on a third less gas for a days work now. My wife Pat drives a postal mail route. I put an Ionizer on her work car. She can really tell the difference. Now I am putting Ionizers on my collection of Trans Ams, one after another.
God Bless You, Harvey Kiker
Tree Surgeon
3601 E. Ramsey Way, Avon Park, Florida 33825
863-443-0315
**********
November 4, 2002
15) Sorry I'm late getting this to you. I put the IONIZER on my '78 Chevy pickup with a 350 4-barrel. I'm getting faster starts, better gas mileage, and actually having to let up on the gas pedal to stay within speed limits. By the way, my speedometer has turned over twice so this engine has more than 200,000 miles on it.
Thanks much,
James Kelly
PO Box 418
Hackett, AR
********
14) December 15, 2002
I own a 1984 Cadillac Coupe Deville with front wheel drive. My partner, Joel Jones, installed an ELECTRONIC ENGINE IONIZER on my car without my knowledge. I started noticing that the car ran better. After a couple of weeks, I mentioned it to him. He asked me to check the gas mileage. When I did, it had increased from 18 to 21 mpg. Then he told me what he had done!
Rick Olten, auto mechanic
J.R. Complete Auto Repair
155325 S. Memorial
Bixby, Ok 74008
**********
13) I have a customer that had me put on an IONIZER about 3 or 4 months ago. Over that period of time, she has owned 5 or 6 different automobiles and has had me transfer the IONIZER every time. She has been very satisfied with the improvement on each of these. The most recent was a 1993 Honda Civic. With the ELECTRONIC ENGINE IONIZER installed, her gas mileage increased from 15 to 19 mpg. She recently told me she traded the Honda off and the IONIZER went with it. Now she wants me to install a new IONIZER for her.
Joel Jones
J.R. Complete Auto Repair
155325 S. Memorial
Bixby, Ok 74008
**********
12) November 12, 2002
I drive a 1994 Chevrolet Suburban, 350 motor, 150,00 miles. The car has had another type of Ionizer on it for 2 years. The gas mileage had improved from 12 MPG to 14 MPG and the tail pipe was clean instead of dirty. So, I was skeptical that the Electronic Engine Ionizer would improve anything.
After the first tank of gas with the Electronic Engine Ionizer installed, the mileage had increased to 16 MPG. We forgot to check the next tank of gas. On the third tank, the gas mileage had jumped to 18 MPG. Wow! And I can tell a difference in acceleration, too.
Pat Buhr
13398 Robbins Road
Springdale, AR 72762
********
11) September 11, 2002
As a future Distributor of the IONIZER, I would recommend the system to anyone that drives over 100 miles per month. I installed the unit on my 1996 Lincoln Town Car that was getting an average of 17.3 miles per gallon. After one month, I am now getting 19.5 miles per gallon and expect it to go up more. Since I use 40 gallons of fuel per week, the IONIZER gives me 88 free miles per week or it saves me $3.75. At this rate, the IONIZER will pay for itself in 11 weeks, less than 3 months. If I could put my IRA making that kind of money, I could retire tomorrow.
I have a shop person in my company that has a 1979 Chevy pick-up. Two weeks ago, he went to get it inspected. The EPA now requires a new, tighter emissions test. The truck failed the test. We installed the IONIZER on the truck, drove it for one week, and went back to the same inspection station. We had it re tested and IT PASSED WITH FLYING COLORS. We also installed the IONIZER on a 90 Subaru, 96 Buck, and a 1979 Continental Lincoln that I am restoring. It also passed inspection the first time in. My wife drives the Subaru and stated that she has to be careful now because with the added power, it almost gets away from her. The other drivers are reporting the same results.
Wish you well in your marketing effects with the IONIZER and I look forward to working with you.
Doyle A. Revis
Dallas, TX
--- heatharvester@earthlink.net
**********
10)September 3, 2002
I own a 1986 Chevy full size blazer. It has 145000 miles on a 305 V-8. Before I installed the Ionizer I was getting 11.3 mils to the gallon. The motors smoked a little when I first started it and it had a small amount of drag time in the execelerator.
After I put the Ionizer on it. Which by the way, was very simple to do and it took me about 2 minutes. I immediately noticed that the execelerator had faster response time with the motor. I also notices that it seemed to have a little more torque to it. After running a couple of tanks of gas in it. I now am getting 14.2 miles to the gallon. I live in Juneau, Alaska. The gas prices aren't exactly cheap here. The new gas mileage and the money that it is going to save me. The Ionizer will soon pay for its self. I have had the Ionizer on for about three weeks. I am now noticing that my motor is smoking less than it was a month ago.
While I am still noticing changes in my blazer, I have put one on my wife's car as well. I look forward to finding out what a difference the Ionizer is going to make on a 1996 Dodge Neon with a four cylinder. I am now currently trying to become a distributor in the Alaska region.
Thanks, Rocky Haden
**********
9) March 23, 2004
We are really happy with our Engine Ionizers. We put a set on our 1998 Dodge pick-up that has 249,800 miles on it. Our pick-up has a standard transmission and 318 engine. Our mileage went from 18 mpg to 23 mpg. And our plug wires need changing and that might bring it up even more. It ran fine before but just driving it into town the first time I could tell it had lots more power.
We have a 1951 Henry J (made by Kaiser) it has a 440 Chrysler engine in it. It's our drag racing car. We put a set on it and the very next 3 runs down the track were constant within a couple of thousandths. We also used less gas on that run. That was the last race of the year. We will learn more this year on the performance.
We also have a 1990 Cadillac. When we bought it last Nov. the man that owned it told us it got 23 mpg on the highway at 70 to 75mph. We put the engine ionizers on it to go to Dallas in Jan. Our first long trip. We had 4 people and lots of luggage. We got 25 mpg out on the road but 23 city driving. But the big surprise was when we went to Arkansas last week. We got 29.2 on the highway and 26 mpg around town. We are sold on The Electronic Engine Ionizer.
Gary and Betty Rosenthal, Carthage, Mo.
**********
8) May 24, 2004 via e-mail:
Just a short e-mail to let you know how excited we are about deciding to put your Electronic Engine Ionizer on our 4x4 1996 Dodge Ram pick-up! My husband installed the Ionizer a few days before we left to go to Sioux Falls, S.D. last week on a business trip. This truck has always averaged 10-11 mpg on the road. Normally, even if gas wasn't as high as it is, we wouldn't have taken the pick-up but we wanted to see what results we'd get with the Ionizer. WOW! To our surprise --after a 1240-mile trip, we averaged 15mpg!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Were we excited??? You bet!
Thank you! Next is the 1997 Voyager van.
By the way, our son Joshua got so excited that he pre-sold more than a half dozen Ionizers before he got he got his Starter Pak.
Thank you--Thank you!
Charlie & Sherry Smith
Cherokee, KS.
1-877-368-8697
**********
7) July 2003
To whom it may concern,
My husband and I recently had Tom Mason install an ionizer on our truck, a 1992 Ford F-150. My husband is a real skeptic and did not believe it would make a difference, but he changed his mind when right after it was installed and we started the truck it started faster, and sounded better. I drove the truck and noticed it ran better and you did not have to push the gas down as far as before. I forgot about this a few days later and was driving down the highway pushing the gas pedal down to the same spot I always did and realized after a few minutes that I was passing a lot of cars, so I looked down at my speed and realized I was driving about ten miles faster than normal, so I had to slow down. I shocked me I had not realized I was driving that fast. It has been a few weeks now, and we noticed that our tailpipes on the truck were a lot cleaner as well. When we first bought the truck, they were dirty, not oily, just dirty, now they are clean and dry. I never realized how much this little thing could do. It truly is a good thing, and it does all that is says it will. I am very happy with it, and it is well with the money. Thank you Tom Mason for helping my truck perform better, it makes me love it that much more. We are very satisfied customers.
Stacy and Carlos
**********
6)May 13, 1971
I want to tell you about my personal experience with the Ionizer.
The “before and “after” tests I made was on my 1971 Monte Carlo with the 350 engine and usual equipment for a car in this class.
Being very careful to set up identical conditions before and after installation of the Ionizer, I found the following very significant results:
1. Revolutions per minute at idling increased 150 at the same carburetor settings.
2. Gasoline mileage before installation in town tested 12.5 miles per gallon. After installation test on four tank fulls increased to 14.4 to 15.2 miles per gallon on the cheapest gas available. I experienced no “ping” on unleaded gasoline.
3. There was a noticeable increase in acceleration.
4. Although carbon build up is not a factor in an engine as new as this one, I know from previous experiments that my car will remain completely clear of carbon as long as I operate it with the Ionizer installed.
We at Bruton Chevrolet are passing on the many advantages of the Ionizer to our customers. We are installing these units on many new and used cars as we deliver them to the new owners. The small initial cost pays for itself many times during the life of the car.
Yours very truly,
Donald M. Bruton
Bruton Chevrolet, Inc.
Lancaster, Texas
********
5)May 13, 1971
Thought you would be interest in knowing we checked on our dynometer the following:
1. A new regular V-8 Chevrolet
2. Same as #1 except with 3,200 miles.
3. A new Vega
4. A 5,000 mile 1971 Chevy Pickup with 350 V-8 engine
5. A 396 Hot Rod Camaro with 3,000 miles
The horsepower at the rear axle immediately increased from two on the Vega to just under seven on the hot rod.
This sold our mechanics on Ionizers.
Best regards,
Bruce W. Lowrie, President
Ernest Allen Chevrolet
Fort Worth, Texas
********
4) December 11, 1970
My wife said it, not I: “Will the car start that fast for me?”
I have a 1970 455 Bonneville that has been hard to start from the day I bought it fourteen months ago. I was told by the service manager where I bought the car that they were all that way. Now that I have the Electronic Engine ionizer on the car, it starts every time with the turn of the key.
Also, The Ionizer on my 1966 Chevy pickup with the 396 engine has given me greater performance than before.
I can’t want my money back; I want to thank you for introducing me to the Electronic Engine Ionizer. I want to buy four more Ionizers for my other trucks.
Sincerely,
John R Lively, owner
IMPS Instant Mobile Powerwash Service,
Dallas Texas
********
3)June 3, 1971
I am writing you this letter to evaluate the Ionizer you left me.
We put it on a 1970 Plymouth Station Wagon, License No. 03052, driven by Bill Kelt. Before the Ionizer was installed, Bill was getting from 9.7 to 10.3 miles per gallon. For the four weeks it was on, he averaged anywhere from 11.2 to 12.5 miles per gallon. This was running empty and loaded – approximately 2,000 lbs. Per trip. The average weekly mileage was 800 miles. The driver, Bill Kelt, was quite impressed as he saw a great difference in the car’s performance. The other Ionizer I put on my 1965 T-Bird which was getting 15.6 miles per gallon. On a trip to Roswell last week, I averaged 17.9 miles per gallon.
I still don’t know how it works, but work it does – I’ve been shown.
By the way, the plugs on that 1970 Plymouth had about 5,000 miles before the Ionizer was put on and they were black and dirty. After the four weeks of driving, we pulled the plugs and they were clean and looked like new.
Yours truly,
W. J. Mayer, Shop Foreman
New Mexico State Highway Department
********
2) June 5, 1971
After a 30-day trial of the Electronic Ionizer, I am happy to say that the Ionizer does everything they claimed it would do.
My gasoline mileage has been improved from 10.5 MPG to 13 MPG. My spark plugs burn cleaner; tailpipe appearance was sooty at the start, now it is clear. I also find that I have better and faster starting, smoother running, and faster acceleration. Also, I am averaging 17.5 MPG on open road driving.
The Electronic Ionizer has indeed improved the performance of my 1968 Belair Chevrolet. It is truly a “Money Saver” for the ordinary working man, and being a member of this class, I do recommend it.
Sincerely,
Omer T Despres, Auto Diagnostic Technician
Auto Diagnostic Center
Albuquerque, New Mexico
********
1) Automobile Exhaust Studies
Date Submitted: Dec. 10, 1970
Submitted by James Turner & Associates, Inc. on behalf of the Electronic Engine IONIZER.
Analytical Report No. 1,321
Mileage on Vehicle: 42,453.8 at time of installation of IONIZER
The exhaust gases of a 1968 Chevrolet 6 cylinder running at idle speed were collected by inserting a glass probe into the tail pipe and drawing the exhaust through 250 milliliter gas collecting bottles with a Gelman Air Sampling vacuum pump.
The exhaust samples were passed through the gas collecting bottles long enough to sweep out normal air and the stop cocks were closed simultaneously as the pump was turned off.
The samples were analyzed by Gas Chromatography Procedures using a Beckman G. C. 2-A Instrument
SUMMARY ANALYSIS
On comparing the concentrations of the exhaust gases before installation of the Ionizer and after installation 3,00 miles later, the following values were obtained:
Hydrogen - 0.41% Increase
Methane - 100.00% Decrease
Hydrocarbons heaver than Methane - 100.00% Decrease
Carbon Monoxide - 4.22% Decrease
Nitrogen and oxygen being normal components in the air, are not calculated as to increase or decrease.
At the time of installation of IONIZER, condition of tail pipe and spark plugs were observed. Both were substantially cleaner and carbon-free 3,000 miles later, indication improved combustion efficiency.
These testimonials have been retyped for use here. Please contact our office for copies of the originals.

Pictures are a representation of the product and may not be the actual application photo for your vehicle, but will function as intended. B&G Electronics, LLC is not responsible for typographical errors. Price subject to change without notice.
Copyright 2004 B&G Electronics, LLC, all rights reserved.